The mystery surrounding non-alcoholic beer Dec22 '07
With holiday parties in full swing, I've been curious to try non-alcoholic beer, for those "in between" days where I would like the taste of beer, but not the alcohol. The majority of the time I drink beer, I really don't care to get buzzed anyway. I mostly just like the refreshing taste. I can do without the headaches and threats of disease.
If you think about it, it makes a lot of sense, specifically for recovering alcoholics. I'd be curious for reasons why the #1 antidote should not simply be non-alcoholic beer.
Non-alcoholic beer seems like the perfect concoction. All of the good stuff; none of the bad stuff.
However, there seems to be a lot of opinions surrounding it. Here are some immediate questions that come to mind:
- Is it true that non-alcoholic beer still contains small traces of alcohol?
- How does the flavor of a non-alcoholic beer compare with real beer?
The large market beer manufacturers (Miller, Bud, Coors, etc.) all have at least one non-alcoholic beer in their line of beverages. But I've heard these taste terrible. (As if regular beer doesn't taste terrible to first-time drinkers?)
There are also smaller labels that produce non-alcoholic beer, which seem to get more praise:
- St. Pauli Girl
- Clausthaler
The extra praise is for the taste. Some say these beers actually taste like real beer.
Other than the taste, if non-alcoholic beers still contain small traces of alcohol, doesn't that defeat the purpose?
Light beers
Does "light" beer only have reduced calories, or also reduced alcohol? I've heard both. I've also heard Guinness has the same amount of alcohol as light beers.
Correlation between alcohol and taste
Does alcohol have a taste? If not, why does the overall flavor of a non-alcoholic beer taste different than a real beer? If they're only removing an "invisible taste," shouldn't the outcome be the same (sans being buzzed)?
Perhaps it's due to the brewing process that occurs for real beer. I'm guessing some important steps are left out for non-alcoholic beer production.
I should try it first
I am forming all of these conclusions from opinions and rumors. I suppose I should try non-alcoholic beer myself, to find out the truth.
Categories: Alcohol
, Beer
, Lifestyle
, Offbeat ![]()
Add Feedback (view all)
Leave feedback
matthom
is published and produced by Matt Thommes - an independent publishing enthusiast, mobile blogger, content creator, informative writer, web developer from Chicago.
Never one to conform, Matt intends to promote the effect the web has on our lives, in an effort to intensify, instruct, and clarify all that is happening around us.
Similar Entries
- A beer a day keeps the doctor away? (3 recent visits)
Stats
230 unique visits since August 2008
Recent Referrers (click)
- calories non alcoholic beer
- Is non alcoholic beer bad for you
- how to turn non-alcoholic beer alcoholic
- Should a recovering alcoholic drink non-alcoholic beer?
- Should a recovering alcoholic drink non-alcoholic beer?
- is non alcoholic beer bad for you
- non-alcoholic beers + calories
- non alcoholic beer bad for you?
- non alcoholic beer bad for you?
- non alcoholic beer calories
- non alcoholic beer and calories
- non alcoholic beer calories
- non alcoholic beer calories
- what is the difference in alcoholic and non alcoholic beer
- miller non-alcoholic beer
- alcoholic
- non alcoholic beer calories
- how to turn non-alcoholic beer in to alcoholic beer
- non alcaholic beers and calories
- non alcoholic beverages for recovering alcoholics